Teaching and learning in virtuality: an autoethonographic story about the body in the new educational settings
Main Article Content
Abstract
Teachers and students build their own ways of doing and seeing as they stay at the university. In this sense, we inhabit these practices, which are characterized by the times and spaces populated by singular discourses, objects, ghosts, looks, illusions and materialities. Our bodies make up this materiality. His presence is essential, for we exist because we are bodies. It is also in them, that our experiences leave traces.
Due to the Covid-19 pandemic, during last year, we have been locked down. Our university had to turn its face-to-face activities into virtual ones. Thus, unthinkable scenes turned up. Our practices have been changed, as well as the place of our bodies in them. We have reinvented ourselves, as uncertainty and unpredictability were extreme. We have produced new senses about teaching and learning. Thus, we have experienced a strangeness of the ways we have to do it before, when we met face to face.
In this writing, I present, from a research approach and a specific methodology such as autoethnography, an autoethnographic story about the body's place in the new virtual scenes of teaching and learning in college.
The objectives of this work are to understand the body´s place in the virtual educational scene and to invite the reader to reflect upon his own corporeality experience when teaching and learning at university in general and in the virtual scenes in particular.
Downloads
Metrics
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
BERENSTEIN, I. (2008). Del ser al hacer. Buenos Aires: Paidós.
BYUNG-CHUL, H (2013). La Sociedad de la transparencia. España: Herder.
CHANG, H. (2008). Autoethnography as method. USA: Left Coast Press,Inc.
CHANG, H., NGUNJIRI, F. W., HERNANDEZ, K. C. (2013). Collaborative autoethnography. USA: Left Coast Press.
DENZIN, N. (2013) [En línea] Autoetnografía analítica o nuevo déjà vu. Traducción Aldo Merlino y Alejandra Martínez. Astrolabio. Número 11, 2013 (207-220). [Consulta: 21 de octubre de 2015]. Disponible en: https://revistas.psi.unc.edu.ar/index.php/astrolabio/article/view/6310/7398
ELLIS, C. (2004). The Ethnographic I. USA: AltaMira Press.
ELLIS, C.; ADAMS, T. Y BOCHNER, A. (2011) Autoethnography: An
Overview. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 12(1), Art.10, [Consulta: 3 de setiembre de 2016]. Disponible en: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1101108.
ELLIS, C. Y BOCHNER, A. (2006) «Analyzing Analytic Autoethnography: An Autopsy». [Consulta: 10 de diciembre de 2010]. Disponible en: Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 2006; 35; 429 – 449.
GERGEN, K. (2009). An invitation to social construction. California: Sage.
HOLMAN JONES, S. (2021). Workshop: Theory and Story: Autotheory, Autoethnography and Other Forms of Bringing Together the Personal and the Theoretical. Notas del taller realizado en el marco del International Symposium on Autoethnography and Narrative (ISAN). Enero 2021.
HOLMAN JONES, S. (2016). Living Bodies of Thought: The «Critical» in Critical Autoethnography. Qualitative Inquiry, 22(4), 228–237.
DOMÍNGUEZ FIGAREDO, D. (2012). Escenarios híbridos, narrativas transmedia, etnografía expandida. En: Revista de Antropología Social. 21.Pp 197-215. [Consulta: 9 de octubre de 2020]. Disponible en: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2811769
DUCH, L Y MELICH, J. C. (2005). Escenarios de la corporalidad. Madrid: Editorial Trotta.
JASINER, G. (2020). La trama de los grupos. Buenos Aires: Lugar editorial.
KEMMIS, S. (2010). What is professional practice? Recognizing and respecting diversity in understandings of practice. En: CLIVE K. (ed.) Elaborating professionalism: Studies in practice and theory. New York: Springer.
LÓPEZ GABRIELIDIS, M. (2015). Régimen de visibilidad y vigilancia en la era de la Identidad Digital. Teknokultura. En: Revista De Cultura Digital Y Movimientos Sociales, 12(3), 473-499. [Consulta: 10 de noviembre de 2020]. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_TK.2015.v12.n3.50385
MAZZA, D. (2014). El sentido de la enseñanza (Partes I y II). En: Revista Noticias, Editorial Perfil. 6 y 13 de diciembre. Argentina.
---------------- (2020). Lo que la pandemia nos deja: una oportunidad para pensarnos como docentes. Buenos Aires. Centro de Innovación en Tecnología y Pedagogía. Secretaría de Asuntos Académicos. UBA. [Consulta: 17 de mayo de 2021]. Disponible en: http://citep.rec.uba.ar/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/AcaDocs_D07_Lo-que-la-pandemia-nos-deja-1.pdf
MERLEAU-PONTY, M. (1964). El hombre y la adversidad. En: Signos, trad. Caridad Martinez y Gabriel Oliver, Barcelona: Seix Barral, 283-304.
NANCY, J.L. (2007). 58 indicios sobre el cuerpo. Extensión del alma. Buenos Aires: Ediciones La Cebra.
NASIO, J.D. (2008). Mi cuerpo y sus imágenes. Buenos Aires: Paidós.
ROA BASTOS, A. (1996). Metaforismos. Buenos Aires: Seix Barral.
SCHATZKI, T. (2001) Introduction: practice theory. En: SCHATZKI, T. KNORR CETINA, K. y VON SAVIGNY, E. (editors). The practice turn in Contemporary Theory. London: Routledge, 10-23.
-------------- (2012). A primer on Practices: Theory and Research». In Hutchings, M. and Trede, F. (editor.) Practice. Based Education: Perspectives and Strategies. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, 13-26.
SOUTO, M. (1996). La clase escolar. Una mirada desde la didáctica de lo grupal. En: CAMILLONI, A., DAVINI, M., EDELSTEIN, G., LITWIN, E., SOUTO, M. y BARCO, S. Corrientes didácticas contemporáneas. Buenos Aires: Paidós.