Using Turnitin with feedback improve academic honesty among high school students
PDF ()

Keywords

high school education
academic plagiarism
cyberplagiarism
copy-paste
academic dishonesty

How to Cite

Díaz Arce, D. (2015). Using Turnitin with feedback improve academic honesty among high school students. Ciencia, Docencia Y Tecnología, 26(51), 197–216. Retrieved from https://ojstesteo.uner.edu.ar/index.php/cdyt/article/view/66

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the behavior of plagiarism by copy-paste internet sources once implemented the use of Turnitin and feedback on high school students. A sample of 68 papers were classified into three academic research from June 2014 to January 2015. The average of General Similarity Index was 21% for all papers, ranging between 2% and 94%. A significant reduction was observed from the first to the third essay. The evidences of copy-paste without giving credit to the original source was 52.9%, which was significantly reduced from 81% in the first study to 20% in the third. There was a significant improvement in academic writing in about 36% of students. It is concluded that Turnitin, used with adequate feedback, can improve the skills of high school students on academic writing and reduce academic dishonesty.

PDF ()

References

Ayo Ajelabi, P. (2013). Assessment of application of an online academic plagiarism detector for british teacher trainees. Journal of Educational and Instructional Studies In The World; 3(2):135-142.

Baker, R.K., Thornton, B., Adams, M. (2008). An Evaluation Of The Effectiveness Of Turnitin.Com As A Tool For Reducing Plagiarism In Graduate Student Term Papers. College Teaching Methods & Styles Journal; 4(9):1-4.

Ballano Olano, I. y Muñoz Aldama, I. (2014). Competencia lecto-escritora y plagio: los desafíos de la era digital. En: Rubén Comas Forgas y Jaume Sureda Negre (Coordinadores). El plagio académico en Educación Secundaria: características del fenómeno y estrategias de intervención. Palma: EiC-Grup de Recerca EDUCACIÓ Y CIUTADANIA. Pág. 8-27.

Batane, T. (2010). Turning to Turnitin to Fight Plagiarism among University Students. Educational Technology & Society, 13 (2):1–12.

Becker, D. A. & Ulstad, I. (2007). Gender Differences in Student Ethics: Are Females Really More Ethical? Plagiary: Cross‐Disciplinary Studies in Plagiarism, Fabrication, and Falsification, 77‐91.

Beléndez Vázquez, M., Comas Forgas, R., Martín Llaguno, M., Muñoz González, A. y Topa Cantisano, G. (2011). Plagio y otras prácticas académicamente incorrectas entre el alumnado universitario de nuevo ingreso (Comunicación en Congreso). IX Jornadas de Redes de Investigación en Docencia Universitaria. Universidad de Alicante, Alicante, 2011. http://gte.uib.es/pape/eic/sites/gte.uib.es.pape.eic/files/files/documentos_biblio/Comunicacion%20Congreso%20Redes%20UA%202011.pdf

Biliæ-Zulle, L.; Frkoviæ,V.; Turk; T.; Azman, Petroveèki, M. (2005). Prevalence of Plagiarism among Medical Students. Croat Med J; 46(1):126-131.

Castañeda-Sortibrán A. N., Araneda C., Mejía-Barrera M. A., León-Rangel L., Rodríguez-Arnaiz R. (2012) ¿Qué fuentes de información usan los universitarios? Revista Fuente; 4(10):38-43.

Cheah, S.W. & Bretag, T. (2008). Making technology work for academic integrity in Malaysia. 3rd International Plagiarism Conference Refereed Proceedings, Newcastle-on-Tyne, U.K. 23-25 June 2008. Consultado el 22/06/2014 desde http://www.plagiarismadvice.org/research-papers/item/making-technology-work-for-academic-integrity-in-malaysia

Dahl, S. (2007). Turnitin®. The student perspective on using plagiarism detection software. Active Learning in Higher Education; 8(2):173-91.

Davis, M. & Carroll, J. (2009).Formative feedback within plagiarism education: Is there a role for text-matching software? International Journal for Educational Integrity; 5 (2):58-70.

Dictionary.com (2015). Plagiarism. Ed: Dictionary.com. LLC. Consultado el 20/12/2014 desde http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/plagiarism?s=t

DRAE - Diccionario de la Lengua Española. (2014). Plagiar. 23ª Edición: Real Academia Española. Consultado el 20/12/2014 desde http://lema.rae.es/drae/?val=PLAGIO

Ercegovac, Z. and Richardson, J.V. (2004). Academic Dishonesty, Plagiarism Included, in the Digital Age: A Literature Review. College & Research Libraries;301-318.

Goddard, R. & Rudzki, R. (2005). Using an Electronic Text-Matching Tool (Turnitin) to detect plagiarism in a New Zealand University. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice; 2(3):58-63.

Holi Ali, H.I. (2013). Minimizing Cyber-Plagiarism through Turnitin: Faculty's & Students’ Perspectives. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature; 2(2):33-42.

Honig, B. & Bedi, A. The Fox in the Hen House: A critical examination of plagiarism among members of the Academy of Management. Academy of Management Learning & Education; 11(1): 101–123.

iParadigms (2011). Un resumen de la eficacia de Turnitin. En: Turnitin descargado el 8/02/2015 desde http://turnitin.com/es/

iParadigms (2014). Turnitin Effectiveness in U.S. Colleges and Universities. En: Turnitin descargado el 8/02/2015 desde http://turnitin.com/

iParadigms (2015). El líder mundial en la prevención del plagio. En: Turnitin consultado el 8/02/2015 desde http://turnitin.com/es/

Jones, L.R. (2011). Academic Integrity & Academic Dishonesty: A Handbook About Cheating & Plagiarism. Revised & Expanded Edition. Melbourne: Florida Institute of Technology.

Joshi, M. & Khanna, J. (2013). Plagiarism Detection over the Web: Review. International Journal of Computer Applications; 68(15):17-20.

Lai, K.W. & Weeks, J.J. (2009). High school students’ understanding of e-plagiarism: Some New Zealand observations. CINZS: LTT, 21(1):1-15.

Ma, H.J.; Wan, G., Lu, E.Y. (2008). Digital Cheating and Plagiarism in Schools. Theory Into Practice, 47:197–203.

Martin, D.F. (2005). Plagiarism and Technology: A Tool for Coping With Plagiarism. Journal of Education for Business; January/February: 149-52.

Merriam-Webster Dictionary (2015). Plagiarism. Ed: Merriam-Webster, Incorporated. Consultado el 20/12/2014 desde http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/plagiarism

Molina, F., Velásquez, J.D., Ríos, S., Calfucoy, P.A., Cociña, M. (2011) El fenómeno del plagio en documentos digitales: un análisis de la situación actual en el sistema educacional chileno. Revista Ingeniería de Sistemas; XXV:5-28.

More, T. & Shelar, V. (2011). Plagiarism and Copyright Violation: A Need of Information Literacy Framework towards Ethical Use of Information. 8th International CALIBER - 2011, Goa University, Goa, March 02-04, 2011

Mut-Amengual, B., Morey-López, M., Comas-Forgas, R., Sureda-Negre. J. (2012). Prevalencia en la comisión de ciberplagio entre alumnado de eso atendiendo a los resultados académicos en asignaturas del área de lengua y literatura. EDUTEC. Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa; No. 40: http://edutec.rediris.es/Revelec2/Revelec40/pdf/Edutec-e_n40_Mut_Morey_Comas_Sureda.pdf

Orthaber, S. (2008). Detecting and preventing plagiarism in a foreign language e-learning course. The International Conference on E-Learning in the Workplace, June 12-13, New York, NY, USA.

Paszkowicz, W., Pełka, J.B., Krupka, J. & Abramowicz, A. (2011). Old Studies with New Authors: A Discovery Ending with Retraction (Letter to Editor). Acta Physica Polonica A ;119(6): 901-903.

Prabhu Shankar , M. and Ramasesh, C. P. (2014) Anti-plagiarism Software – A tool to ensure quality research output. In: National Conference on "Librarians and Librarianship in Transition: Challenges and Opportunities LIBTRANS 2014"., 22-23 August, 2014., Mangalore. Consultado el 15/10/2014 desde http://eprints.uni-mysore.ac.in/17107/1/Anti-Plagiarism_Software_-A_tool_to_ensure_quality_research_output.pdf

Pupovac, V., Bilic-Zulle, L, Petrovecki, M. (2008). On academic plagiarism in Europe. An analytic approach based on four studies. In: R. Comas, J. Sureda (coords.). Academic cyberplagiarism. Digithum. No. 10. UOC. Consultado el 21/12/2014 desde http://www.uoc.edu/digithum/10/dt/eng/pupovac_bilic-zulle_petrovecki.pdf

Schlosser Montes, K. (2014). La percepción del plagio académico de los estudiantes y docentes de las facultades de arquitectura, derecho e ingeniería en la universidad Rafael Landívar (Tesis de Posgrado). Universidad Rafael Landívar: Guatemala de la Asunción. http://biblio3.url.edu.gt/Tesario/2014/05/83/Schlosser-Karen.pdf

Soto Rodríguez, A. (2012). El plagio y su impacto a nivel académico y profesional. E-Ciencias de la Información; 2(1):1-13.

Sureda, J., Comas, R., Serrano, L., Nava, C., Oliver, M., Morey, M. (2009). El plagio y otras formas de deshonestidad académica entre el alumnado de la universidad TecMilenio: resultados generales. Informe de Investigación. Universitat de les Illes Balears. http://www.ciberplagio.com/universidad/attachment.php?key=51

Sureda-Negre, J., Comas-Forgas, R., Oliver-Trobat, M.F. (2015). Plagio académico entre alumnado de secundaria y bachillerato: Diferencias en cuanto al género y la procrastinación. Comunicar; XXII(44): 103-111.

The Free Dictionary (2015). Plagio. Ed: Farlex Inc. Consultado el 20/12/2014 desde http://es.thefreedictionary.com/plagio

Ummi Fa’iezah, L. (2010). Gender Differences in Plagiarism Attitudes among Indonesian University Students in Perth Australia. Journal of Education; 1(2):1-18.

University of Oxford (2015). Plagiarism. Ed: University of Oxford. Consultado el 20/12/2014 desde http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/plagiarism?s=t

The authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right to be the first publication of the work, as well as licensing it under a Creative Commons Attribution License  that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the authorship of the work and publication initial in this magazine. All content is published under the Creative Commons 4.0 international license: Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...