Citizen Social Science for participation in public policies on socioenvironmental issues. Analysis of a case study in Argentina. Analysis of a case study in Argentina.
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Citizen Science is a framework that promotes the involvement of the general public in different research activities, which could contribute to various stages of public policy making. This paper reflects on the potential role of Citizen Science in socioenvironmental policies, in the context of the project “CoAct Ciencia Social Ciudadana para la Justicia Ambiental” in the Matanza-Riachuelo Basin in Argentina. Citizen participation often constitutes a legal mandate in environmental policies, creating a relevant context to study how receptive are policy decision makers when integrating iniciatives of citizen science into public policy. We present the methodology and results of a workshop created in partnership with the Ministry of Science, Tecnology and Innovation of Argentina and the United Nations Development Programme’s Accelerator Labs, with 21 players of public policy for the basin in September 2022. The goal was to identify options in policy that could improve the potential role of citizen science in the processes of policy making for sanitation of the basin. We used an adapted version of the prospective method of three horizons to identify obstacles as well as opportunities for specific policy instruments. We conclude by discussing policy options that came up in workshop discussions and in dialogue with the literature.
Downloads
Metrics
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right to be the first publication of the work, as well as licensing it under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the authorship of the work and publication initial in this magazine. All content is published under the Creative Commons 4.0 international license: Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike.
References
ACUMAR(2023). Monitor PISA. https://monitorpisa.acumar.gob.ar
ACTIS, G. (2021). Instancias de política pública para la promoción de la Ciencia Ciudadana. Iniciativas internacionales y del Norte Global. Policy Brief—Documentos de trabajo CENIT. https://fund-cenit.org.ar/wp-content/uploads/Instancias-de-politica-publica-para-la-promocion-de-la-Ciencia-Ciudadana.pdf.
ACTIS, G., Arza, V., & Cane, S. (2022). Ciencia Social Ciudadana para la Política de Saneamiento en la Cuenca Matanza-Riachuelo. https://zenodo.org/records/7484717
ARZA, V., Actis, G., Curutchet, S., Castro, L., & Velarde, M. (2021). Ciencia Ciudadana: Beneficios y desafíos con ilustraciones de casos de Argentina. Documento de posición. http://fund-cenit.org.ar/ciencia-ciudadana-beneficios-y-desafios-con-ilustraciones-de-casos-de-argentina-documento-de-posicion/
ARZA, V., Velarde, M., Actis, G., Cané, S., Castro, L., Larroca Ruiz, M., Curutchet, S., & Marchegiani, P. (2021). CoActD5.3: Open Source Digital Platform. QPR: ¿Qué Pasa, Riachuelo? a citizen social science tool to promote Environmental Justice in Matanza-Riachuelo Basin. Zenodo. https://zenodo.org/record/6106852
ARZA, V., Actis, G., Marchegiani, P., Velarde, M., Cane, S., Buchsbaum, M., & Swistun, D. (2020). CoActD5.1: Knowledge Coalition Building. Environmental Justice. Zenodo. https://zenodo.org/record/4498635
BABINI, D. y Rovelli, L. (2020). Tendencias recientes en las políticas científicas de ciencia abierta y acceso abierto en Iberoamérica. CLACSO-Fundación Carolina. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1gm02tq
BAUTISTA-PUIG, N.;De Filippo, D.;Mauleón, E. y Sanz-Casado, E. (2019). Scientific Landscape of Citizen Science Publications: Dynamics, Content and Presence in Social Media. Publications, 7(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7010012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7010012
BEIGEL, M. F. (2022). El proyecto de ciencia abierta en un mundo desigual. Relaciones Internacionales, 50, 163-181. https://doi.org/10.15366/relacionesinternacionales2022.50.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15366/relacionesinternacionales2022.50.008
BERGER, M. S. (2013). Justicia ambiental en América Latina. Inteligencia colectiva y creatividad institucional contra la desposesión de derechos. e-cadernos CES, 17, 112-135. https://ri.conicet.gov.ar/handle/11336/15051 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/eces.1128
BERTISUMAN, A.; Balestrini, M.;Haklay, M. ySchade, S. (2023). When Concerned People Produce Environmental Information: A Need to Re-Think Existing Legal Frameworks and Governance Models? Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 8(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.496 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.496
BONNEY, R. (1996). Citizen science: A lab tradition. Living Bird, 15(4), 7-15.
BONNEY, R. (2009). Public Participation in Scientific Research: Defining the Field and Assessing Its Potential for Informal Science Education. A CAISE Inquiry Group Report. Online Submission. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED519688
BORTZ, G. M. yGarrido, S. M. (2022). Nuevas herramientas para analizar dinámicas de participación en proyectos de desarrollo local. Revista Reflexiones, 103(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.15517/rr.v103i1.50707 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15517/rr.v103i1.50707
BROWN, S. R. (1980). Political subjectivity: Applications of Q methodology in political science. Yale University Press.
CHAPMAN, C. yHodges, C. (2017). Can Citizen Science seriously contribute to policy development? A decision maker’s view. En L. Ceccaroni y J. Piera,Analyzing the Role of Citizen Science in Modern Research (pp. 246-261). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0962-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0962-2.ch012
CIMADAMORE, A. D.;Paz, J. A.;Pautassi, L. C. yMallimaci, F. H. (2020). Introducción. En Ciencia de la sostenibilidad, pobreza y desarrollo en la Argentina del Siglo XXI. Siglo XXI.
COHEN, K.;Doubleday, R. yMeller, M. (2021). Future Directions for Citizen Science and Public Policy. Centre forScience and Policy.
COMISIÓNECONÓMICAPARAAMÉRICALATINAY EL CARIBE (CEPAL) (2021). Acuerdo Regional sobre el Acceso a la Información, la Participación Pública y el Acceso a la Justicia en Asuntos Ambientales en América Latina y el Caribe (LC/PUB.2018/8/Rev.1).Santiago.
COUVET, D.;Jiguet, F.;Julliard, R.;Levrel, H. yTeyssedre, A. (2008). Enhancing citizen contributions to biodiversity science and public policy. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 33(1), 95-103. https://doi.org/10.1179/030801808X260031 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1179/030801808X260031
DEFILIPPO, D. yD’Onofrio, M. G. (2019). Alcances y limitaciones de la ciencia abierta en Latinoamérica: Análisis de las políticas públicas y publicaciones científicas de la región. Hipertext.net, 19, 32-48. https://doi.org/10.31009/hipertext.net.2019.i19.03 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31009/hipertext.net.2019.i19.03
DICKEL, S. y Franzen, M. (2016). The “Problem of Extension” revisited: New modes of digital participation in science. Journal of Science Communication, 15(1), A06. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.15010206 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22323/2.15010206
DOSEMAGEN, S. y Parker, A. (2019). Citizen Science Across a Spectrum: Building Partnerships to Broaden the Impact of Citizen Science. Science & Technology Studies, 24-33. https://doi.org/10.23987/sts.60419 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23987/sts.60419
ECSA (2015). Ten Principles of Citizen Science. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/XPR2N
EITZEL, M. V.;Cappadonna, J. L.; Santos-Lang, C.;Duerr, R. E.;Virapongse, A.;West, S. E.;Kyba, C. C. M.;Bowser, A.;Cooper, C. B.;Sforzi, A.;Metcalfe, A. N.;Harris, E. S.;Thiel, M.;Haklay, M.;Ponciano, L.;Roche, J.;Ceccaroni, L.; Shilling, F. M.;Dörler, D., … Jiang, Q. (2017). Citizen Science Terminology Matters: Exploring Key Terms. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 2(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.96EUROPEANCOMMISSION, JOINTRESEARCHCENTRE (JRC) (2018). An inventory of citizen science activities for environmental policies. European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC) [Dataset] PID: http://data.europa.eu/89h/jrc-citsci-10004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.113
FAINSTEIN, C. (2020). Problemas del mientras tanto: Espera y justicia en la “Causa Mendoza”. Avá. Revista de Antropología, (36), 165-193.
FELD, A. (2020). ¿De dónde venimos y hacia dónde vamos?: Conceptos y contextos para pensar la historia de las políticas de ciencia, tecnología e innovación en la Argentina.Ciencia e Investigación,70(2), 34-50.https://ri.conicet.gov.ar/handle/11336/170409
FISCHER, F. (1993). Citizen participation and the democratization of policy expertise: From theoretical inquiry to practical cases. Policy Sciences, 26(3), 165-187. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00999715 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00999715
FISCHER, F. (2000). Citizens, Experts, and the Environment: The Politics of Local Knowledge. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11smwd9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822380283
FRAISL, D.;Campbell, J.;See, L.;Wehn, U.;Wardlaw, J.;Gold, M.;Moorthy, I.;Arias, R.;Piera, J.;Oliver, J. L.;Masó, J.;Penker, M. y Fritz, S. (2020). Mapping citizen science contributions to the UN sustainable development goals. Sustainability Science, 15, 1735-1751. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00833-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00833-7
FRITZ, S.;See, L.;Carlson, T.;Haklay, M. (Muki); Oliver, J. L.;Fraisl, D.;Mondardini, R.; Brocklehurst, M.; Shanley, L. A.;Schade, S.;Wehn, U.;Abrate, T.;Anstee, J.;Arnold, S.;Billot, M.;Campbell, J.;Espey, J.;Gold, M.;Hager, G.;… West, S. (2019). Citizen science and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. Nature Sustainability, 2(10), 922-930. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0390-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0390-3
GUERRINI, C. J.;Majumder, M. A.;Lewellyn, M. J. y McGuire, A. L. (2018). Citizen science, public policy. Science, 361(6398), 134-136. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aar8379 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aar8379
HAKLAY, M. (2013). Citizen Science and Volunteered Geographic Information: Overview and Typology of Participation. En D. Sui, S. Elwood yM. Goodchild (eds.), Crowdsourcing Geographic Knowledge (pp. 105-122). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4587-2_7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4587-2_7
HAKLAY, M.;Fraisl, D.;GreshakeTzovaras, B.;Hecker, S.;Gold, M.;Hager, G.;Ceccaroni, L.;Kieslinger, B.;Wehn, U.; Woods, S.;Nold, C.;Balázs, B.;Mazzonetto, M.;Ruefenacht, S.; Shanley, L. A.;Wagenknecht, K.; Motion, A.;Sforzi, A.; Riemenschneider, D.; … Vohland, K. (2021). Contours of citizen science: A vignette study. Royal Society Open Science, 8(8), 202108. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.202108 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.202108
HAKLAY, M.;Motion, A.;Balázs, B.;Kieslinger, B.;GreshakeTzovaras, B.;Nold, C.;Dörler, D.;Fraisl, D.;Riemenschneider, D.;Heigl, F.;Brounéus, F.;Hager, G.;Heuer, K.;Wagenknecht, K.;Vohland, K.;Shanley, L.;Deveaux, L.;Ceccaroni, L.;Weißpflug, M.;… Wehn, U. (2020). ECSA’s Characteristics of Citizen Science. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3758668
HEAD, B. W. (2022). Wicked Problems in Public Policy: Understanding and Responding to Complex Challenges. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94580-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94580-0
HUFTY, M. (2008). Una propuesta para concretizar el concepto de gobernanza: El Marco Analítico de la Gobernanza. Gobernabilidad y gobernanza en los territorios de América Latina. La Paz: IFEA-IRD.
IRWIN, A. (1995). Citizen Science: A study of people, expertise, and sustainable development. Routledge.
IRWIN, A. (2006). The Politics of Talk: Coming to Terms with the ‘New’ Scientific Governance. Social Studies of Science, 36(2), 299-320. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312706053350 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312706053350
JASANOFF, S. (2003). Technologies of Humility: Citizen Participation in Governing Science. Minerva, 41(3), 223-244. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025557512320 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025557512320
JASANOFF, S. (2004). Science and citizenship: A new synergy. Science & Public Policy (SPP), 31(2), 90-94. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154304781780064 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3152/147154304781780064
KULLENBERG, C. yKasperowski, D. (2016). What is citizen science? –A scientometric meta-analysis. PloS one, 11(1), e0147152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147152
KLOETZER, L.;Lorke, J.;Roche, J.;Golumbic, Y.;Winter, S.;Jõgeva, A. yRoche, J. (2021). Learning in Citizen Science. Springer Nature. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58278-4_15
LENGWILER, M. (2008). Participatory Approaches in Science and Technology: Historical Origins and Current Practices in Critical Perspective. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 33(2), 186-200. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243907311262 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243907311262
MANZONI, M., Vohland, K. ySchade, S. (2021). Exploring Citizen Science Strategies and Initiatives in Europe. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58278-4_3
MCKEOWN, B. yThomas, D. B. (2013). Q methodology (Vol. 66). Sage publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483384412
MERLINSKY, M. G.;Toledo López, V.;Schmidt, M.;Fernández Bouzo, M. S.;Tobias, M.;Langbehn, L.;Pereira, P. yCapalbo, T. (2018). Defender lo común.Qué podemos aprender de los conflictos ambientales. (1.a edición). Instituto de Investigaciones Gino Germani- Universidad de Buenos Aires. http://geaiigg.sociales.uba.ar/wp-content/uploads/sites/209/2019/07/Libro-Cuadernillo-Defender-lo-comun-VERSION-WEB.pdf
MILLER-RUSHING, A.;Primack, R. y Bonney, R. (2012). The history of public participation in ecological research. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10(6), 285-290. https://doi.org/10.1890/110278 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/110278
MILLER, C. A. yWyborn, C. (2020). Co-production in global sustainability: Histories and theories. Environmental Science & Policy, 113, 88-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.01.016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.01.016
NASCIMENTO, S.;Iglesias, J. M. R.;Owen, R.;Schade, S. y Shanley, L. (2018). Citizen science for policy formulation and implementation. EnCitizen Science: Innovation in Open Science, Society and Policy. (pp. 219-240). UCL Press. https://doi.org/10.14324/111.9781787352339 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv550cf2.23
NOWOTNY, H.;Scott, P. B. yGibbons, M. T. (2001). Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. Wiley. www.wiley.com/en-us/Re+Thinking+Science%3A+Knowledge+and+the+Public+in+an+Age+of+Uncertainty-p-9780745657073
OSTROM, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807763
OWEN, R. P. yParker, A. J. (2018). Citizen science in environmental protection agencies. En S. Hecker, M. Haklay, A. Bowser, Z. Makuch, J. Vogel yA. Bonn (eds.), Citizen Science: Innovation in Open Science, Society and Policy (pp. 284-300). UCL Press. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10066319/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv550cf2.27
OXFORD English Dictionary, s.v. “citizen science, n.”, septiembre de2023. https://doi.org/10.1093/OED/6784505301 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/OED/6784505301
PILAND, N.;Castañeda, A.; Varese, M.; Soacha Godoy, K. A.;Ponciano, L.;D’Onofrio, G.;Espitia, J. E.;Luis, C.; Piera, J. y Plos, A. (2020). Citizen science from the Iberoamerican perspective: An overview, and insights by the RICAP network.
PIÑA-ROMERO, J.;Reyes-Galindo, L. y Novoa, L. A. V. (2022). Citizen science in Latin America and the Global South, Part 1. Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society, 5(1), 2145040. https://doi.org/10.1080/25729861.2022.2145040 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/25729861.2022.2145040
PNUDy MINCYT. (2021). Ciencia Ciudadana Ambiental: Mapeo de iniciativas nacionales. www.argentina.gob.ar/sites/default/files/ciencia_ciudadana_ambiental_-_mapeo_de_iniciativas_nacionales.pdf
ROWE, G. y Frewer, L. J. (2005). A Typology of Public Engagement Mechanisms. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 30(2), 251-290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243904271724 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243904271724
SAUERMANN, H.;Vohland, K.;Antoniou, V.;Balázs, B.;Göbel, C.;Karatzas, K.;Mooney, P.;Perelló, J.;Ponti, M.;Samson, R. yWinter, S. (2020). Citizen science and sustainability transitions. Research Policy, 49(5), 103978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.103978 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.103978
SCHADE, S.;Pelacho, M.;van Noordwijk, T. (C. G. E.);Vohland, K.;Hecker, S. y Manzoni, M. (2021). Citizen Science and Policy. En K. Vohland, A. Land-Zandstra, L. Ceccaroni, R. Lemmens, J. Perelló, M. Ponti, R. Samson yK. Wagenknecht (eds.), The Science of Citizen Science (pp. 351-371). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58278-4_18 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58278-4_18
SECRETARÍADEAMBIENTEY DESARROLLO SUSTENTABLE DE LA NACIÓN (SADS) (2019). Guía para fortalecer la participación pública y la evaluación de los impactos sociales (1.a ed.). Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires: Secretaría de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sustentable de la Nación.
SHARPE, B.;Hodgson, A.;Leicester, G.;Lyon, A. yFazey, I. (2016). Three horizons: a pathways practice for transformation. Ecology and Society, 21(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08388-210247
SCHELLER, D.;Thomas, S.;Arnold, A.;Wissenbach, K. R.;MboaNkoudou, T. H.;Cigarini, A.;Bonhoure, I.;Perelló, J., Mayer, K.;Kieslinger, B.;Schäfer, T.;Schürz, S.;Wöhrer, V.;Wintersteller, T.; Malik, M.;Lombion, C.;Winfree, L.;Arza, V.;Mitats, B.;… Pío, M. J. S. (2020). CoActD2.1: Report on State of the Art of Citizen Social Science. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4810909
SHIRK, J.;Ballard, H.;Wilderman, C.;Phillips, T.;Wiggins, A.;Jordan, R.;McCallie, E.;Minarchek, M.;Lewenstein, B.;Krasny, M. y Bonney, R. (2012). Public Participation in Scientific Research: A Framework for Deliberate Design. Ecology and Society, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04705-170229 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04705-170229
STILGOE, J.;Irwin, A. yJones, K. (2006). The received wisdom: Opening up expert advice. Demos.
STIRLING, A. (2008). “Opening Up” and “Closing Down”: Power, Participation, and Pluralism in the Social Appraisal of Technology. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 33(2), 262-294. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243907311265 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243907311265
SVAMPA, M. (2020). ¿Hacia dónde van los movimientos por la justicia climática? Nueva Sociedad, 286, 108-121. https://static.nuso.org/media/articles/downloads/6.TC_Svampa_286.pdf
USEPA, O. (2014, noviembre 3). Environmental Justice [Collections and Lists]. www.epa.gov/environmentaljustice
VELHO, L. (2011). La ciencia y los paradigmas de la política científica, tecnológica y de innovación. En P. Arellano Hernández yP. Kreimer (eds.). Estudio social de la ciencia y la tecnología desde América Latina. Siglo del Hombre Editores.
WEBLER, T.;Danielson, S. yTuler, S. (2009). Using Q method to reveal social perspectives in environmental research. Greenfield MA: Social and Environmental Research Institute, 54, 1-45.
WIGGINS, A. yCrowston, K. (2011). From Conservation to Crowdsourcing: A Typology of Citizen Science. 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2011.207 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2011.207
WYETH, G. (2023). Integrating Citizen Science into the Work of United States Environmental Agencies (n.o1). 8(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.490 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.490